| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: Situation on R2:50 |
Hi Roy! Tuesday April 25 2006, Roy Witt wrote to Vladimir Donskoy: VD>> For example: now is election on NC 2:5020 - one of the largest VD>> network on world, near 600 nodes. Now we have 106 votes after first VD>> week (theoretical full will near 150 votes - big percent)... Or other VD>> example: I make election REC 2:50 by NCs and NECs on 2003 - total 172 VD>> sysops, and I has only 43 vote! So - even living working controlling VD>> sysops are passive on elections (and referendum too). Or example by VD>> another region - I make election (as vote-checker) on RC 2:45 on 2004 VD>> year, and from 360 nodes I has 49 votes. RW> But the question remains; did those votes count as they should, or was the RW> election stalled because there wasn't a majority turnout of voters? Read Policy 8.6 - it is not require quorum! So - all this elections are realized. RW> In the real world, the votes would be tallied and the election finished. RW> In Doosche's world, the election would be a failure because there wasn't a RW> majority turnout. Policy require majority votes for start elections and sample count votes on election process result. "Weight" of the vote isn't count by Policy :-( . Therefore a logical conclusion - it means existence of regions (and networks) about the identical size that we and achieve in a new own zone. Regards, Vladimir Donskoy --- GoldED+/W32-MINGW 1.1.5-b20060326* Origin: DVB Station (2:5020/2992) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 5030/786 @PATH: 5020/2992 140/1 106/2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.