Hi Roy!

Tuesday April 25 2006, Roy Witt wrote to Vladimir Donskoy:

 VD>>>> To me it will be personally indifferent which number at our zone

 RW>>> It may be, but creating zone 7 in Fidonet means that number would
 RW>>> have to be shared with another network.

 VD>> Number of another networks is very low, I know 1 ("Zone7
Project" in
 VD>> our region) and I see in list one more (in USA). This correction very
 VD>> easy.

 RW> Accept that the creation of another zone in the face of one that's going
 RW> to be deleted in two months makes this zone 7 idea a bad one. It'd be much
 RW> easier for you to migrate your region to zone 6.

I can be not convinced of it, I and have suggested to use a zone 6 for our transfer!

 VD>>>> if only we could pass in it the laws solving our problems.
 RW>>> That would be nice...
 VD>> Beatifull is victory our candidate on Z2C election, but it is
 VD>> fantastic. :-)

 RW> Browzing the nodelist, I believe the Russian/Ukrainian nodes have the
 RW> majority to call for and elect a new Z2C from your own ranks...

How your way, re-elections new Z2C will begin if R50C will demand it?
Policy demand the minimum 50% of voices of all RC at zone (P4 8.7) but if
to consider your way one voice R50C will suffice!

 VD>>>> As you could notice, in a referendum number of our zone has not
 VD>>>> been specified so its result can be treated and for Z6.
 RW>>> Yes, that's true. But your referandum had too many choices. And they
 RW>>> should have required only 'Yes' or 'No' answers.
 VD>> I not wrote questions on referedum so it is all for work and we have
 VD>> no another...

 RW> Perhaps it would be best then, to elect your own Z2C and that would
 RW> provide you with a means to do with the present zone, that which pleases
 RW> all of you. You shouldn't let a minority rule over you when you can do
 RW> that very easily with all of those Russian nodes in the zone. They
 RW> outnumber the rest of the zone.

But Ward it does not want!

Regards, Vladimir Donskoy

--- GoldED+/W32-MINGW 1.1.5-b20060326