Hi Roy!

Tuesday April 25 2006, Roy Witt wrote to Vladimir Donskoy:

 >>>> And if they have not voted that simply because it the destiny of
 >>>> region is indifferent and by that have given the right to solve the
 >>>> destiny to other, more active sysops.

 WD>>> You're joking, right?

 VD>> Particulary... If sysop on node not read netmail which receive his
 VD>> node - I name he "passive" (not "active").

 RW> Just call him 'inactive' then, not passive.

Because this netmail required his reaction - sysop is "passive".
"Inactive" sysop read his netmail as minimum...

Regards, Vladimir Donskoy

--- GoldED+/W32-MINGW 1.1.5-b20060326