Hello Ed,

> ~>>> I'm glad to see you changed your position.
> >> No change.
> ST> Originally you dismissed it out of hand, and then you shifted your
> ST> direction.  I'm not sure what I missed....
> You are displaying intellectual dishonesty here. Earl has not changed his
> position. Your effort to make it look like he has is failing, just live 
> with it
> and move on.

No, he originally dismissed it out of hand and then back tracked.

> ~>>> You doubt that people who teach at Harvard are educated?
> >> Hmmm.  I say "I don't doubt their education," and
you respond that I do
> >> doubt it?  I'll go with MY answer.
> ST> If I misread your message, then I apologize - it wasn't intentional.
> I find that highly unlikely.

THIS is exactly why it's difficult to have a conversation in this echo.  You 
simply 'attack' me by calling me a name rather than discuss the issue.  You 
just stopped any forward progress with this conversation.  There is no 
reason to continue this or any thread with you if you continue to be rude 
and hostile.  I made a mistake and appologized.  If you aren't grown up 
enough to be civil, then perhaps you should rethink what you are doing.

Good day,
Shannon

--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5a