| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Executing a program? |
David Muir wrote in a message to Mike Bilow: MB> I really never thought about it. I developed MUTEX so long ago that MB> it antedates OS/2 Warp, and is actually a 16-bit program, althouh I MB> have modified it by adding a few command line switches as recently as MB> a year ago. I seem to recall that COMSPEC was the DOS flavor and MB> OS2_SHELL was the OS/2 flavor. It never occurred to me to revisit the MB> question. DM> If it makes you feel any better, I agree with you. OS/2 DM> set me up with OS2_SHELL pointing to CMD.EXE and COMSPEC DM> pointing to COMMAND.COM. This leads me to believe that your DM> assumption is correct. That and the fact that a number of DM> OS/2 doors I have, attempt to execute "comspec" which is not DM> defined in an OS/2 session which effectivley results in no DM> OS shell available. (Both variables are in my config.sys). DM> It would seem that IBM's intention was to differentiate the DM> two variables for the two platforms. I checked further, and it does seem that, officially, COMSPEC is supposed to point to the DOS command processor, not the OS/2 command processor. My (OS/2 Warp Connect) system does see the COMSPEC environment variable defined in an OS/2 session, and it is defined to point to CMD.EXE. I am fairly sure that, at some point in the past, I chose OS2_SHELL for a reason, but I am not entirely sure I now know what it was. -- Mike ---* Origin: N1BEE BBS +1 401 944 8498 V.34/V.FC/V.32bis/HST16.8 (1:323/107) SEEN-BY: 50/99 78/0 270/101 620/243 711/401 409 410 413 430 808 809 934 955 SEEN-BY: 712/407 515 517 628 713/888 800/1 7877/2809 @PATH: 323/107 170/400 396/1 270/101 712/515 711/808 809 934 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.