MW>> Or am I completely wrong when I thought that most new
 MW>> applications that are developed today, uses some type
 MW>> of application framework, such as MFC, OWL, etc.?

 pf> That would be a shame if it were true -- both of those are
 pf> proprietary,and lock you in to one vendor.

That might be true when talking about OWL, but is it correct to call MFC
proprietary? It is included with the compilers from Microsoft, Watcom and
Symantec (and maybe some more that I don't remember/know about).

Sure, Microsoft is the ones that writes MFC, and decides what it should
contain. But on the other hand, that is true for all the SDK functions too,
so the situation is almost the same.


        Mats
        mw{at}findata.se

---