On 10-12-09, SHANNON TALLEY said to TIM RICHARDSON:



> That number of yours has a lot of holes in it. Where did that number come


ST>Read my reply to Earl.


For what? That doesn't give a credible source, either.


> But they fail to mention *how large a part*.....nor do they explain how
> they come by their numbers.


ST>The reporter didn't give a detailed account of the facts, but since it's a
ST>Harvard study, they will have that information publically available.
ST>Since you are so curious, why do you ask them?  Having knowledge about how
ST>these types of studies and formulas are done, I'm comfortable with their
ST>results. >


Oh well! Harvard! *That* closes off any questioning of the numbers. We all
know how reliable and unbiased Harvard is!


TR>Um.....`excuse me'? *The republicans* forcing an empty solution down our
TR>throats?


ST>Yes, they don't have a solution - and that's the point.


Before The clown in the White House got elected, there wasn't this big a
problem in the first place.



ST>Remember when our president and that ass shouted " You Lie " ?


How can I forget! The one person in the whole chamber who had the guts to
call the clown from the White House on his lies.


ST>During that same moment, the republicans were waiving around pieces of
ST>paper.  Do you know what was written on them?  Nothing.  They were blank,
ST>empty, void of words (that's all information that is publically available).


Yes.....I know. It was one of the defining moments of that whole evening,
aside from Joe Wilson calling the clown from the White House on his lies.


You obviously have no clue as to what that meant. I'll clue you in:


It was a silent gesture meant to tell the clown from the White House that he
has no plan. Nothing. He has a document over one thousand pages long that is
full of stuff nobody understands (not even a large number of those individuals
who inhabit Congress, who happen to be *lawyers*!), neither he nor his blind
followers will even read, will not put out in a forum that makes it available
to the people to see whats in it, and is pushing with all his might to get it
passed.


That alone, the extreme rhetoric, the scare tactics, the refusal to let the
people see whats in it, should make a sensible person want to back away from
it for a time, until its fully understood.


By the way.......I think one of the *biggest* reasons they don't want the
whole, complete `legislative-language' bill seen by the voters, is because we
might see what they will be attaching to it as `riders'.


But the whole thing is sort of scary.


ST>The republicans want the same-old - same-old, no solutions for the masses
ST>without the means in which to afford it or the problems with being
ST>rejected.


Most of the republicans see that....whatever the `solution' to the health care
problem is.....*government* ain't it!


Whenever government gets involved in something, they only muck it up. And if
its already mucked up.....government will muck it up even worse.


> The last time I looked......Obama was a democrat. So is Chris Dodd, so is
> Pelosi, so is Reid! And this whole issue is being pushed by *the
> democrats*!


ST>The public option, yes.  You were confused as to what I was referring in
ST>this post.


The only thing thats `confused' is this whole health care thing.


This was tried by the Clintons. It got rejected.


This time its being rejected by a cross section of the people all over the
country. Although we are (of course) being labeled as `racists' for objecting
to having this shoved on us without even so much as being allowed to see what
they are trying to force on us.


By the way......I recently read somewhere (the WSJ?) that around 85% of
Americans already have some form of health care, and that the clown in the
White House wants to spend almost trillion dollars to insure only about 15% of
the people!





---
*Durango b301 #PE*