>  VD> Because this netmail required his reaction - sysop is
"passive".
 >  VD> "Inactive" sysop read his netmail as minimum...
 >
 > Given that the netmail required a reply, an action the sysop must do to
 > maintain active status and he didn't, means he's inactive.
 >

Who says it needed a reply?  Just because a sysop refuses to answer,
does not make him inactive.  You, and others have been arguing that
point before.  It is especially true if the netmail is not from his
NC/RC.

--- SBBSecho 2.11-Win32