GM>>> Now we'll see whether the netmail reply that I'm posting
GM>>> at the same time as this gets out ;-)

ml>> i haven't seen anything via netmail as of yet... not knowing what
ml>> area it showed up in or what software is involved, i can only
ml>> guess at either an addressing format problem or extracting of the
ml>> message for off system delivery... there could also be a routing
ml>> problem but i suspect one of the first two... it is possible that
ml>> you have inbound due to manual operations by the sysop...

 AS> Your last comment about SysOp's manual intervention, *might*
 AS> be part of the answer Mark. TTBOMK, the BBS that Greg's posting
 AS> via - is an eSoft's TBBS/TIMS/FLAME combination.

ahhh...

 AS> *If* he's doing the messaging via the TBBS QSO "door" then,
 AS> provided Brian Wormald's set things up for his QWK/QSO users
 AS> to send Netmail, Greg would probably have to use that old
 AS> "first line of message kluge" in order to send.  IYSWIM.

yes, i do...

i'll never understand why folk didn't fully embrace the fido methods ;-( 
things would have been so much better... heck, even adding security
features such that a sysop could see netmail routing and header info
without seeing the message body is/was possible... that, in itself, would
have prevented much of the privacy issues that abound(ed)... sometimes it
sucks to be a hobbiest ;-((

)\/(ark