Jeff Binkley -> Ed Hulett wrote:



 >>>>>> Then she may not like having a new law passed
that will fine
 >>>>>> her for not being
 >>>>>> insured.

 ST>>>>> It wouldn't happen because they would provide her insurance
 ST>>>>> she could afford.  She would be fined if she didn't get any
 EH>>>> insurance, but not if she
 ST>>>>> couldn't afford it.  That's one of the misconceptions that is
 ST>>>>> consistently being popularized by the conservative movement
 ST>>>>> that is trying to get this discredited.  I thought you'd be
 ST>>>>> better than that.

 EH>>>> So, only those who can afford health insurance but refuse to
 EH>>>> buy it will be fined? Where is the authority to do that in the
 EH>>>> Constitution? And who exactly do you think will pay for those
 EH>>>> who cannot afford to pay for their own? The
"evil" rich?

 JB>>> Have you seen now where the unions are lining up against this ?
 JB>>> They have figured out that these "caddilac"
healthcare plans
 JB>>> that are going to be taxed include their own.  Nobody is going
 JB>>> to take away what they have fought and struck over for years.
 JB>>> It is funny to watch.

 EH>> I noticed that. It's interesting to see them do a 180 so quickly
 EH>> without getting whiplash.

 JB> Any time the government says they are here to help you, grab your
 JB> wallet.

I'd rather a crackhead steal my money than the federal government. The
crackhead will use it to destroy himself, the government will use it to
destroy society.

Ed

-- 
"Truth does not become more true by virtue of the fact that the
entire world agrees with it, nor less so even if the whole world
disagrees with it." --Jewish philosopher Maimonides (1135-1204)

Blogs: http://edsramblings.wordpress.com | http://woodcaringnsuch.wordpress.com
http://edsscrollsawbits.blogspot.com

Facebook: http://wwwfacebook/com/ed.hulett | Twitter: yaesu

Linux User #416016
Linux Machine #385030

--- Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817)