| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | HPFS386 performance for programmers |
PE> I personally had an application (rescan of my messagebase), which PE> an HPFS386 4 meg cache made take 2 seconds instead of 25 seconds PE> for a rescan, because 4 meg allowed all the indexes to be stored PE> in RAM. It is very silly IMO to say And, in reality, how often are you required to do this rescan twice in a row? This is the type of silly bench test I was talking about... --- Maximus/2 3.00* Origin: Sol 3 * Toronto * V.32 * (905)858-8488 (1:259/414) SEEN-BY: 50/99 78/0 270/101 620/243 711/401 409 410 413 430 808 809 934 955 SEEN-BY: 712/407 515 517 628 713/888 800/1 7877/2809 @PATH: 259/414 400 99 250/99 3615/50 396/1 270/101 712/515 711/808 809 934 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.