On 10-13-09, SHANNON TALLEY said to JOHN MASSEY:

ST>Hi John,


> ST>>> I believe a public option is necessary.


> ->> To bad there is no prevision in the U.S. Constitution for the
> ->> government  to use tax payer money to pay for it.


> ST> That's not even relevent.


> So you are going on record saying the U.S. Constitution is of no
> relevance. The the rule of law means nothing to you.


ST>Are you that unethical that you would shove words into my Emails to change
ST>the meaning?  You have no idea how to get your point across do you.


He didn't `shove' anything into your `Emails'. He made an observation based on
what `you' said. He made his point quite well. The problem is...you `missed'
the point.


ST>No, that's not what I meant and you know it.  I meant that your comment
ST>was not relevant to the conversation.


It certainly was `relevant' to the conversation. There is no provision in the
Constitution that allows our government to *force* everybody to have health
care. NOR...is there any provision in the Constitution that allows our
Congress to write, vote to pass, and send to the president, legislation that
they will not even allow the people to read and understand before hand.


That they've been doing so for many years, under many presidents, means that
its become so habitual that they now have the arrogance to flat-out, publicly
refuse, to show the people what they are about to impose on us.


ST>If your writing provides any indication into your ethics, then you are are
ST>a very unethical person.


John's `ethics' are just fine. The biggest problem here is you don't really
know what you're talking about.





---
*Durango b301 #PE*