| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | DAPIE is useless? |
PF> MW> One thing I've been wondering about regarding DAPIE; PF> MW> what about MFC? Are there any problems recompiling MFC PF> MW> with DAPIE? PF> PF> It does not support MFC (this is a feature, not a bug ). PF> PF> At ColoradOS/2, they polled developers about dapie PF> features that people wanted -- MFC was not a popular choice. BH> Excuse me. Guys. What's the point of providing a means of porting BH> Windows apps to OS/2 without supporting the most-used C++ class library BH> for Windows apps? Says you....I think OWL is actually used more. I don't like either of them. I do expect MFC to be supported -- or at least all of the Win32 apis required for you to compile it yourself -- in the not to distant future. --- Maximus/2 3.00* Origin: Sol 3 * Toronto * V.32 * (905)858-8488 (1:259/414) SEEN-BY: 50/99 78/0 270/101 620/243 711/401 409 410 413 430 808 809 934 955 SEEN-BY: 712/407 515 517 628 713/888 800/1 7877/2809 @PATH: 259/414 400 99 250/99 3615/50 396/1 270/101 712/515 711/808 809 934 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.