You get the idea by now.  The rest is just gravy.

~>  Your own arguement against Buchanan haveing a knife

I made no such argument, of course.  Klahn made it up.  Just like he made
up his certainty that Buchanan HAD a knife and his certainty that Buchanan
APPEARED to have a knife when the police "caught" him.

~>  EC> What Kovach actually said was that more calls came in "that
~>  EC> day" than in the previous day, which compares about a four
~>  EC> or five hour period to a twenty-four hour period (more half
~>  EC> of which came BEFORE the radio show). Kovach attributes the
 
~>  I don't give a damn what Kovach said, you provide a source
~>  for it, it's your claim.

Kovach was the author of the book that reported Shearer's version of what
happened.  Shearer's claim.  He now wants to say that I am Cody Shearer,
simply because I informed him of what Shearer actually said and I informed
him of what Shearer did and did NOT actually witness.  And once again his
"response" has nothing to do with the facts.

~>  As above, I found the Kovach reference, now I most certainly do
~>  give a damn what Kovach said, since his book proves your
~>  deception.

When the facts go against him, he ignores the facts.  When he thinks they
don't, suddenly he cares very much.  Since there was no "deception" at all,
and I accurately reported what was said, he has no point here at all.  And
he only SAYS "deception" without even TRYING to show one.  But it really is
hilarious to see him completely reverse his position about something in ONE
SENTENCE!

~>  EC> Same old .  He ignores the fact that it is NOT
~>  EC> speculation.  The tire damage is fact.
 
~>  The speculation on your part most specifically was that slashing
~>  the tires was Buchanan's intent in the whole incident.

This is great comedy, John!  Buchanan hears the story about Shearer, he
gets Shearer's address, he goes there on a Sunday afternoon, he breaks into
the garage, he damages Shearer's tires, he goes back outside and drives
away.  Now, pause and ASK YOURSELF, how can a person do that
UNintentionally?  Is it really "speculation" to think that he didn't just
slip with a dart in his hand and ACCIDENTALLY damage a tire?  And yet Klahn
spews nonsense like then and then acts like he is SAYING something!

~>  EC> The SPECULATION is
~>  EC> Klahn's story that the guy broke into the garage,
~>  EC> vandalized the tires, thus tipping off house guests who
 
~>  Actually, that he broke into the garage and slashed the tires
~>  was your speculation. You have to have some evidence that the
~>  garage was secured and needed to be broken into.

Go ahead and laugh!  A long string of news stories report that Buchanan
broke into the garage, and Klahn says they are all engaging in SPECULATION!
 He has latched onto a word, and he is going to use it no matter what!

~>  Yet it was Croasmun's own sources, Chinni and Kovach, who say
~>  Buchanan threatened to kill Shearer.

Actually it was Shearer who said that, and Bob is just unable to grasp that
simple fact.  And he once again wants to disown Shearer as HIS source, and
wants to consider Shearer to belong to ME.  But Shearer didn't witness any
such thing, and the actual police reports of the actual witnesses did not
go nearly that far.

 
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5a