TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! ANSI
echo: cbm
to: Whammo
from: Shaun Bebbington
date: 2018-04-16 14:29:26
subject: Re: C64 BASIC - what`s faster INT() or %? Plus benefits of DEF FN A()

On Monday, 16 April 2018 22:20:51 UTC+1, Whammo  wrote:
> > Other than less typing throughout the program (where you might
have lots of repeated random number generation in this example), are there
any benefits to using CBM functions? Does it save bytes overall would be
perhaps one that I could think of.
> >
> > Many thanks,
> >
> > Shaun.
>
>  Other than that, it's faster to inline code than to define a function.

Thanks for the info.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | FidoUsenet Gateway (3:770/3)
SEEN-BY: 57/0 116/102 153/150 250 317/2 3 393/68 633/267 280 640/384 712/620
SEEN-BY: 712/848 770/0 1 3 100 340 772/0 1 210 500
@PATH: 770/3 1 712/848 633/267

SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com

Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.