Hello andrew!

*** 02.01.2004 at 23:22, andrew clarke wrote to Martin Foster:

 ac> Thu 2004-01-01 07:13, Martin Foster (2:250/501.2) wrote to andrew
 ac> clarke: 

 ac>>> Yep.  This is correct as per 1.11.b1 anyway.

 MF>> Are there any plans to implement JAM support?

 ac> Well, "fix and/or reimplement" would be a better description. 

Yes, OK :)

 ac>  I forget who last mentioned they were going to look at that code
 ac> (Oliver?), 

I think it may have been Bo ?

 ac> but either way I haven't heard from them.  I gave up a
 ac> while ago as I don't know that part of the code well enough to fix
 ac> it, and don't need that feature personally, 

I could do with it because it would make my message base rather more
"portable" than it is at the moment.

Regards,
Martin

--- timEd/BeOS 1.11.b1