Vladimir,
 
> There are still more some occasions to creation of the zone, for example
> - difficulty of coordination of the big number of networks one person
 
How difficult can it be? R50 has already shed over 2,000 nodes, a fact
which has nothing to do with that zone-matter. It is the fastest declining
entity in Fidonet. It has happened everywhere and now happens in R50. If
the trend is universal then R50 will even-out somewhere between 500 and 600
nodes.
 
> (any expert on management will confirm an inefficiency - if not
> impossibility - to operate over 150 subordinates without attraction of an
> intermediate link of management and the control).
 
"Subordinates" and "control" is what nobody has ever
wanted in Fidonet. If you want a good reason why such a zone for region-50
is bad-business then look no further, you have found it.
 
> And at last the fifth consider that anything to change is not necessary -
> let FIDO itself will die :) .
 
Same old stuff, we've been hearing that over and over again for about a decade now.
 
> And if they have not
> voted that simply because it the destiny of region is indifferent and by
> that have given the right to solve the destiny to other, more active
> sysops.
 
You're joking, right?
 
> I do not know, what exactly has answered Malcolm (and whether it has
> answered in general).
 
There was a clear "No" answered to RC50. If that is a problem to
you then please indicate which part of "No" you don't understand.
 
Take care,
 
 \%/{at}rd

--- D'Bridge 2.41