27 Apr 06 10:21, Vladimir Donskoy wrote to Roy Witt:

 VD> Hi Roy!

 VD> Tuesday April 25 2006, Roy Witt wrote to Vladimir Donskoy:

 >>>>> And if they have not voted that simply because it the
destiny of
 >>>>> region is indifferent and by that have given the
right to solve the
 >>>>> destiny to other, more active sysops.

 WD>>>> You're joking, right?

 VD>>> Particulary... If sysop on node not read netmail which receive his
 VD>>> node - I name he "passive" (not "active").

 RW>> Just call him 'inactive' then, not passive.

 VD> Because this netmail required his reaction - sysop is "passive".
 VD> "Inactive" sysop read his netmail as minimum...

Given that the netmail required a reply, an action the sysop must do to
maintain active status and he didn't, means he's inactive.


Roy
--- Twit(t) Filter v2.1 (C) 2000