Hi Ward!

Tuesday April 25 2006, Ward Dossche wrote to Vladimir Donskoy:

 >> Particulary... If sysop on node not read netmail which receive his node
 >> - I name he "passive" (not "active").

 WD> That depends ... does a sysop need to read netmail in order to be
 WD> "active"?

Does a sysop need to read his netmail? Or must do it?

 WD> And where did those sysops who didn't respond give a formal authorisation
 WD> for someone else to handle affairs in their name? To me they did not
 WD> formally relinquish their rights, as you suggested.

Read Policy 8.6 - not quorum!

 >> I don't see this letter so I can't understand it. Answer
"NO" without
 >> arguments is bad answer.

 WD> That depends ...

 Question>: "Mama, can I get an ice-cream?"
 Answer>:   "No"

 WD> Maybe the kid finds it a bad answer, but not because the lack of
 WD> argumentation.

 WD> Mama finds it a perfect answer.

You consider us as children?

Regards, Vladimir Donskoy

--- GoldED+/W32-MINGW 1.1.5-b20060326