27 Apr 06 16:32, mark lewis wrote to Roy Witt:


 >>> Your region could implement this without a problem by placing the
 >>> ZMH flag after the User flag, i.e. U,ZMH:vw - no ZC aproval
 >>> required, just your RC's...

 WD>> That's what you think ... ERRFLAGS will kick it out. ;-)

 RW>> Why would a *C want to refuse a User flag to a sysop? Especially
 RW>> one that would help them communicate.

 ml> especially considering that USER flags are not set in stone and never
 ml> have been... at least not until ol'e WD came along dictating (or
 ml> trying to) what =he= felt was ok to go in the nodelist...

One nice thing about ERRFLAGS is that it won't catch that user flag unless
he configs it to do so before hand. Even then, I'm not so sure it will
kick it out (I havn't played with it in a long while). But, since he's
seen the idea, he seems to agree that it might do the Russians some good.
We'll see what happens.


Roy
--- Twit(t) Filter v2.1 (C) 2000