BK>>>>  And the idea was stupid, and fraudulent,

 JM> Your Opinion.

 Well...yeah... just as your opinion was in agreement with the
 article.

 BK>>>>  Ultimately the accusation is against Stan, so just chill out
 BK>>>>  while it works it's way out.

 JM>>> Ah,, Bob,  I got it. I saw the slam was against Stan. And I
 JM>>> saw you take something that I do and will continue to do
 JM>>> and use it as something to try and start something between
 JM>>> Stan and me.

 BK>>  Nope. Not between Stan and you, and not start something. It's
 BK>>  between Stan and me, and it's already started.

 JM> Yes it started when you accused Stan of plagiarism.

 Ah, you do have a problem with honesty. If your statement is
 true, then you must agree with Stan, that posting material
 without attribution is claiming yourself as the source.

 Do you really want to go down that road?


 JM>>> If Stan ever said any thing to me about why I
 JM>>> don't always attribute stuff, he would get the same answer
 JM>>> I gave you. "I have my reasons."

 BK>>  I can't imagine why.

 JM> That does not surprise me.



 JM>>> I have suggested that
 JM>>> people that get bent out of shape over the issue,  People
 JM>>> that don't seem to have any problem finding out who wrote
 JM>>> it BTW,   turn me in to the Boortz webmaster or the
 JM>>> Boortz's legal team.

 BK>>  Why? Is it like I care?

 JM> Then the next time I do it, (and there will be a next time)
 JM> you won't say anything about it, right?

 JM> --- Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (Windows/20070604)
 JM>  (1:123/789.0)

BOB KLAHN bob.klahn{at}sev.org   http://home.toltbbs.com/bobklahn

... It ain't what ya don't know, but what you know that aint so that'l hurt ya.
 * Silver Xpress V4.5/P [Reg]
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5a