Vladimir,
 
> Particulary... If sysop on node not read netmail which receive his node -
> I name he "passive" (not "active").
 
That depends ... does a sysop need to read netmail in order to be "active"?
 
And where did those sysops who didn't respond give a formal authorisation
for someone else to handle affairs in their name? To me they did not
formally relinquish their rights, as you suggested.
 
> I don't see this letter so I can't understand it. Answer "NO" without
> arguments is bad answer.
 
That depends ...
 
Question: "Mama, can I get an ice-cream?"
Answer:   "No"
 
Maybe the kid finds it a bad answer, but not because the lack of argumentation.
 
Mama finds it a perfect answer.
 
 \%/{at}rd

--- D'Bridge 2.41