| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: NT tools |
From: "Tony Ingenoso"
Objectified C++ still has some significant bloat/performance issues IMO, in
some cases the penalty over a standard C equivalent can be dramatic.
There's places where I'd not chose it, others where I would, and others
where I'd use neither C++ or C.
I blame C/C++ for a lot of the flakiness in modern code. For most people
writing in them it like handing a scalpel to a 3 year old to play
with...the results can be messy ;->
"Paul Ranson" wrote in message
news:3ee08f6b$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> I've no problem with old code, but I see no point in writing new code in an
> old style.
>
> Obviously malloc() is available and usually where 'new' ends up, but it's
> not a requirement. There are many interesting optimisation strategies
> available with different allocation strategies.
>
> Paul
--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-4
* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45)SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 379/45 1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.