>*** Quoting Philip Lozier from a message to Carol Shenkenberger ***
 >
 >PL>> What percentage of -responding- nodes voted -for-, and what
percentage
 >PL>> voted -against-... this is of -responding- nodes who
actually particip
 >
 > CS> Ward posted that a moment ago.  I have only his report on it.  The
 > CS> 33% above was wrong.
 >
 >PL> Yes... I see what's going on now... sorta.  It gets a -little- clearer
 >PL> as we go along.  Seems only a few are privy to exactly what went on an
 >PL> being that Russia is fairly well isolated in the eyes of the rest of F
 >PL> it is still hard to determine exactly what the whole deal was though.
 >
 >Exactly.  They didnt bother to send Ward the full details nor have they
 >sent them to me.  Both of us knew there was a 'referendum' (vote?) and a
 >very general 'gist'.
 >

gist? what's that?

 >Fair is fair.  It pisses me off a bit that some take the stance that 'Ward
 >is guilty' of something this time.  He's totally innocent this time.  He
 >brought the issue to the ZCC right away as soon as he had some shreds of
 >info.  Z4C was the first to note the numbers were too low to mean anything
 >should be done with what little we have.

es, Fair is Fair I agree... we all should be fair to each other :-) � >
 >I am fully aware that most of my own information on this comes from the
 >radical small percentage.  I do not mind that but I aint dumb.  I believe
 >the other ZC's are just as wise on this.  Thats the damnable part of the
 >job, that you sometimes have to accept that what you'd like everyone else
 >to want, aint happen'n but can be confused easy if all the info you do get
 >direct, is from the non-mainstream.
 >


--- SLMAIL v5.1  (#SLO409KEDG15G098)