25 Apr 06 10:40, Vladimir Donskoy wrote to Roy Witt:

 VD> Hi Roy!

 VD> Sunday April 23 2006, Roy Witt wrote to Vladimir Donskoy:

 VD>>> To me it will be personally indifferent which number at our zone

 RW>> It may be, but creating zone 7 in Fidonet means that number would
 RW>> have to be shared with another network.

 VD> Number of another networks is very low, I know 1 ("Zone7
Project" in
 VD> our region) and I see in list one more (in USA). This correction very
 VD> easy.

Accept that the creation of another zone in the face of one that's going
to be deleted in two months makes this zone 7 idea a bad one. It'd be much
easier for you to migrate your region to zone 6.

 VD>>> if only we could pass in it the laws solving our problems.
 RW>> That would be nice...
 VD> Beatifull is victory our candidate on Z2C election, but it is
 VD> fantastic. :-)

Browzing the nodelist, I believe the Russian/Ukrainian nodes have the
majority to call for and elect a new Z2C from your own ranks...

 VD>>> As you could notice, in a referendum number of our zone has not
 VD>>> been specified so its result can be treated and for Z6.
 RW>> Yes, that's true. But your referandum had too many choices. And they
 RW>> should have required only 'Yes' or 'No' answers.
 VD> I not wrote questions on referedum so it is all for work and we have
 VD> no another...

Perhaps it would be best then, to elect your own Z2C and that would
provide you with a means to do with the present zone, that which pleases
all of you. You shouldn't let a minority rule over you when you can do
that very easily with all of those Russian nodes in the zone. They
outnumber the rest of the zone.


Roy
--- Twit(t) Filter v2.1 (C) 2000