CH> I have a PDR in my notebook that can identify most any
RW>HUH?  Every PDR I've ever seen has been about 12"X8"X4"
There is computer software that incorporates the pdr.
RW>I'll tell you right now there is no way you are going
  >to ID them w/o a lab.  I'd be willing to bet that very
  >few pharmacist would even try much less be able to ID
  >them by site.  You MIGHT be able to determine what they
  >aren't with a field kit.  IOW, they wouldn't test
  >positive for opiates or what ever.
The PDR's have photos and descriptions of many, many pills.
RW>So if I had a bug up my butt about the police and/or
  >the ZT policy and wanted to pull your chain by not
  >telling you what they were what would you do?  Arrest
  >me right?
Nope.  Hold you for investigation while I check out just what the
substance is.
RW>Let us say that there is a ZT policy in effect that
  >says anyone caught carrying drugs that can not be IDed
  >is to be arrested.  The PC being the pills.  Ok lets
Your statement is somewhat confusing.  If an officer cannot establish
probable cause to believe that whatever you are carrying is a 
controlled substance; and that you are not entitled to possess that
controlled substance he can't legally arrest you.  There would be no
such zt policy.
CHARLES HUNTER
 * 1st 2.00 #9124 * Observation, not old age, brings wisdom.
--- QScan/PCB v1.19b / 01-0671
---------------