| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Cpu ! |
Charles Angelich wrote in a message to Roy J. Tellason: JP>> Who gives a hoot ? RJT> Good point. Most people aren't fully utilizing their RJT> hardware anyway... CA> As I've said before - type, print, type, print. CA> There are a few of us who run the system at 100% frequently. Doing CA> music files, creating MP3s and WMAs, then archiving all of it into CA> one file all require 100% processor cycles to do. CA> Those who do graphics and those who recompile frequently also need CA> as much 'power' as they can get. CA> Granted, a small minority, but we think we are an important CA> minority. :-) No argument from me on that... I've pushed things to the limit, but only occasionally. And since the response of my K6-200 system gets really sluggish at that point, I try to avoid doing so when I can. But I still think that for most people it doesn't matter. ---* Origin: TANSTAAFL BBS 717-838-8539 (1:270/615) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 270/615 150/220 379/1 106/1 2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.