Dear Paul, in regards to this message to me,.

 >  Hi! David,


G'day David, G'day Paul,.

 > In a message to Gaelyne Gasson you wrote:

 > GG>> All opposed (who don't pay for others to receive the AVTech echo)

 > DD> Bugger - I guess I'm stuck with him.

 > DD> You can't pop around to the institution that houses him and filter it

 >  I was just warming to the guy.


Thankyou for this public support,.

 > Is he a repeat offender in the echo?


That depends on how you define offender, i have been here a few times,.

 > (I'm essentially a newbie here.)


And i welcome you,.

 > I'll go with a majority decision in this case since I believe a
moderator    > isn't necessary for the echo, but the decision to cut the
guy seems a a bit  > extreme.


Yes it does seem a bit extreme, because it is a bit extreme, which is a
good reason to not go with the majority decision,.

 > I'd have exercised my right of _no_ reply at a future stage if I was
no      > longer deriving some light entertainment through bantering
with him, in any  > case.


As would i exercise the same right under the same circumstances,.

 > That usually tends to make the drips go a little dry, if there's no  
       > comeback.


Aha,.

without    > pizza makes one week.


And a boringly healthy one at that,.

 > (ZMH only) (3:640/384)

--- FLAME v2.0/b