Saturday September 03 2016 16:02, you wrote to me:
AI>> Under your plan we will have lost our sysop echo.
MV> According to Janis, echomail is not part of Fidonet.
Technically that is true isn't it?
When I applied for fidonet I sent a netmail to the NC of net 153 and a few days
leter he replied with the details of my nodelisting. I was a nodelisted sysop.
Not a single echomail had been sent, recieved or even thought of beyond the
basic idea.
MV> Following that reasoning, "we" can not "lose" "our" sysop echo, as
MV> "we" never "had" it in the first place.
Of course we can and it looks like that is what is happening. That situation
does not make me happy. Fidonet as a whole is important to me whether we are
communicating via echomail or netmail.
MV> It is no man's land...
So it seems. Regardless of that I will stand up for what is important to me.
Being able to communicate with other sysops from all zones is important to me.
I prefer myself that the two sysop echoes remain restricted to ourselves but if
the group decided it should be readable by all then I am OK with that too.
I think it should also be writable by all in a case like that but I think we
should decide that as a group.
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20160322
* Origin: The Rusty MailBox - Penticton, BC Canada (1:153/757)
|