| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Netjobs |
> I suspect that this new system is to automate the process. I > assume the computer polls everyone's page and sneds out an > automatic letter if you're not getting hits. JT> I wouldn't think it even goes that far. It's probably, smarter, JT> that is, it fits people who have been on the dole for longer to JT> jobs, the short term unemployed are low risk (to the govt as JT> far as outgoing payments go) so they don't worry about them. JT> It's the long term they want to pay less, so they are more JT> likely to give the few jobs they DO have to them. They have a special "intensive care" system or something. Wait... I'll look it up. I *love* bureaucratese. Intensive Support Services! Centrelink is shedding *all* its services now, passing it on the the agencies. If you are not a prime candidate, they don't actually give you the best job to get rid of you... they put you in the Intensive Support. It's an agency! They get paid two ways: Centrelink pays them to run all this crap, and they get a share of the first-year's salar - so it works the opposite to what you're saying. The keep the jobs for the *prime* suspects, where they're sure to get a divvy on the first year, and the long-term no-hopers like me go into Intensive Care which presumably pays more from Centrelink. There is *nothing* of value for me on their site. It looks liek they have dumped the professional end of the job market entirely. I went to an Intensive Support interview last Friday, and the nice lady suggested I go to teaching, at TAFE! ROFL! I'm 64 in November, my degree is incomplete and 40 years old anyway, and the conversion course from engineering to teaching is 12 months. What the fuck? Oh. I forgot to mention, TAFE has compulsory retirement at 65. Then she asked had I considered voluntary work. "What for?" says I. "Are you saying that I'm worhtless?" ROFL! This is fun! And when I get enough ammunition I'll dump the bucket on fat Mandy. My real target is the way Mandy dumped the Mature Age Allowance. Last year, in your sixties if you were already a Carer, Invalid, or long-term out of work, you went onto the equivalent to the Pension, perks and all. That's been dumped (quietly) and all that remains is the dole (known as New Start). Obviously, it's ridiculous. No one is going to employ a 60+ with dated skills. It's jsut a way to screw us oldies. JT> It however has never worked. Even in the early days, looking JT> for a job via the CES was usually pointless. The local rag was JT> by far more fruitful. Yes. But Centrelink *pretends* it works. It's no use just saying it - if you want to hurt Mandy, you have to have an *actual* case. I reckon I have a great story... real Ray Martin material. I give up a consultancy career to look after my poor old mother, and when I try to return to the workforce five years later, all I get is the Centrelink tapdance and a box of useless computer-generated letters. And no money either! > I've never checked a reference, it's easy enough to tell if he's > bullshitting, and if he's good enough to fool you, he's the man > for the job! JT> All the good bullshitters must have faded into the past. I've JT> never come across anyone who has even come close to JT> bullshitting us. They just don't put the effort into it JT> anymore... I was conned by a classic. He was American, an engineer, he had all sorts of paper, worked on everything... a beauty! So I hired him and then we discovered he couldn't solder! Did not have a clue! I didn't sack him, though. Just gave him a tech's wages and taught him to solder. Ed... he was a brilliant conman. > What I see as a better system, run by Centrelink, is no agents, > just a database with all jobs and all job-seekers. The employer > lists his job and immediately gets hits. The boss scrolls down > and marks the likely ones - and Centrelink sends out the > notification to those who have a hit. JT> But then, they would have to become the headhunters, and, JT> possibly have to actually do some work. This way, they pay JT> someone else to do that for them (and half-arsed at that). So far, from inside the system, actually pretending I want a job and giving all the right answers... it seems to me that they only *pretend* to be finding you a job. The pretty lady gave me a pep talk (standard "think outside the square" crap, how pathetic is that?) but provided nothing. She's been trained to motivate dorks to find their *own* job, or invent one. And then after two months when I move out of this Intensive Support bullshit, I go onto the long-term no hoper list and that's the end fo that. Or I hope so, anyway. It'll be a real bastard if they actually get me a job. Regards, Bob --- BQWK Alpha 0.5* Origin: Precision Nonsense, Sydney (3:712/610.12) SEEN-BY: 633/104 260 262 267 270 285 640/296 305 384 531 954 1042 1674 690/734 SEEN-BY: 712/610 848 713/615 774/605 800/1 @PATH: 712/610 640/531 954 633/260 267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.