RS>> You havent actually established that Paul appearing as the poster
RS>> of a message is actually a 'problem' in the P4 policy sense tho.
PE>> Both the ex-N711-NC and the current N712 interpret the fact that my
PE>> INITIALS appeared in QUOTED TEXT of a message to mean that John was
PE>> violating P4.
PE>> And then Ted H had the audacity to complain about ME
PE>> reinterpreting policy! BFN. Paul.
JT> I would have expected it from David, but not Ted. Boy was I wrong.
Did he speak to you about it? BFN. Paul.
@EOT:
---
* Origin: X (3:711/934.9)
|