Hi Kurt,
In a message to Daniel Troy you wrote:
 KW> it may actually do the desirable thing aswell, but the common
 KW> definition going around right now doesn't require that it 
 KW> does...
I made a conscious decision not to get involved this time around.  I see that 
someone else has provided (what I consider) the "more correct" response, so 
will continue with my non-inolvement. :-)
Rick
--- 
---------------