On 3/09/2016 6:25 PM, Alan Ianson -> David Drummond wrote:

 JK>>> Nobody is talking about excluding anyone from chat echos.

 DD>> FN_SYSOP and FIDO_SYSOP are chat echoes. Nothing more. Anything is on
 DD>> topic.

 AI> Your missing that one little detail again.

My what is missing one little detail?

 JK>>> If one is not a sysop however, one should not be posting or
 JK>>> reading a sysop echo. Makes sense to me...

 DD>> WHY should they not be accessing? What is chatted about there there
 DD>> that is so special that one needs to be a sysop to witness it? Are you
 DD>> so ashamed of your behaviour in those echoes that you would want your
 DD>> users to see what sort of person you really are?

 AI> Will you please stop the theatricks.

Until you can present some logical argument as to why non sysops should be
excluded from the chat echoes FN_SYSOP and FIDO_SYSOP I guess I have nothing
further to discuss. Anonymous access to the echoes remains at my system.

Have a nice evening.

-- 

Regards
David

E&OE

--- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.8.0