Bob Klahn -> John Massey wrote:

 BK>  Say what? I brought it up early on when Stan turned this into a
 BK>  flame echo. The whining since has come from the right. I live by
 BK>  the rules of the echo.

 JM>> just as much a flamer as anyone else here.

 BK>  With one difference, I respond, not initiate.

O BullShit You drop a flame at people for no reason other than to drop a flame.


 JM>> That's why you post in this echo,

 BK>  Really really dumb. Explain why I posted in this echo before
 BK>  Stan arrived, in Jan 05. Back when this echo was flame free.

 JM>> and why your Debate echo is, for all practical purposes, dead

 BK>  So, you are saying a flame echo is better than no echo?

yep

I
 BK>  disagree. I would rather see the echo die than turn into a flame
 BK>  echo.

Well if debate is any example, you got your wish.

 JM>> BTW what has happen to that anal retentive lawyer
 JM>> co-moderator  that answers post 6 months old with what I'm
 JM>> sure he thinks is witty repartee.

 BK>  Just who are you talking about? You seem to be confused again.

I think his name is Peter, something or other.

--- Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (Windows/20070604)