Bob Klahn -> John Massey wrote:


 BK>>>  And the idea was stupid, and fraudulent,

Your Opinion.

 BK>>>  Ultimately the accusation is against Stan, so just chill out
 BK>>>  while it works it's way out.

 JM>> Ah,, Bob,  I got it. I saw the slam was against Stan. And I
 JM>> saw you take something that I do and will continue to do
 JM>> and use it as something to try and start something between
 JM>> Stan and me.

 BK>  Nope. Not between Stan and you, and not start something. It's
 BK>  between Stan and me, and it's already started.

Yes it started when you accused Stan of plagiarism.



 JM>> If Stan ever said any thing to me about why I
 JM>> don't always attribute stuff, he would get the same answer
 JM>> I gave you. "I have my reasons."

 BK>  I can't imagine why.

That does not surprise me.



 JM>> I have suggested that
 JM>> people that get bent out of shape over the issue,  People
 JM>> that don't seem to have any problem finding out who wrote
 JM>> it BTW,   turn me in to the Boortz webmaster or the
 JM>> Boortz's legal team.

 BK>  Why? Is it like I care?

Then the next time I do it, (and there will be a next time) you won't say
anything about it, right?

--- Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (Windows/20070604)