JIM HOLSONBACK -> JOHN MASSEY wrote:
 JH> Looks like this weaselly little fellow has shit in his own messkit.

 -=>> On 06-20-07 10:07 BOB (Pee-Wee) KLAHN wrote to JOHN MASSEY <=-

 JH> --
 BK>>  Before Hardegree, no flames. I went back about a month and a
 BK>>  half in the echo before he chimed in. No flames. I offered that
 BK>>  opportunity to anyone who was interested, no takers. Docs place
 BK>>  cycled those msgs off after about a year, so they are no longer
 BK>>  there. I can easily send you my archives of that time, but they
 BK>>  only include msgs that involve me.

 JH> In other words, he now has _nothing_ with which he can "prove" his
 JH> claims that Stan started the flaming here, and is responsible for
 JH> turning this into a flame echo.  Without any proof, all of his recent
 JH> claims in that regard are just those of an empty, blustering windbag.
 JH> All he can do now is start with weaseling tactics, trying to avoid
 JH> responsibility, and here it comes - -

 BK>>  You had the chance. Now that the chance is gone, it's awfully
 BK>>  weasly of you to demand proof when you would not look at it the
 BK>>  first time around.

 JH> Ah, so it's _your_ fault, you weasel, you.  How _dare_ you wait until
 JH> now to ask for proof he is unable to provide, you weaselly fellow.

 JH> --

 JM>> You have never proven this echo was flame free before Jan
 JM>> 05. You have only expressed your opinion that it was.

 JH> And all he has is his famous 'archives', with which he can prove
 JH> _nothing_ with respect to the echo as a whole.

 BK>>  I offered the proof a year ago. Now I can repost my archives,
 BK>>  but they do not include msgs that don't involve me. You had the
 BK>>  chance. If you ignored it that's your failure, not mine.

 JH> All said above; argumentum ad nauseum.

 JH> --

 JH> A typical liberal evasion of responsibility.  Through his own
 JH> negligence, he now has _nothing_ to support his recent assertions, and
 JH> he is trying to blame it on you.  Liberals _hate_ to take responsibility
 JH> for their own failures; it is _always_ someone else's fault, and _never_
 JH> their own.

 JH> Now, having failed to make sure he could back them up, he has posted all
 JH> these recent claims, and with nothing to back them up, he has shown he
 JH> is nothing but an empty windbag, full of hot air.


That purity much sums him up.

--- Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (Windows/20070604)