JIM HOLSONBACK -> JOHN MASSEY wrote:
 -=>> On 06-20-07 12:41 JOHN MASSEY wrote to BOB KLAHN <=-
 JH> --
 BK>>>>>>  You do know that what I said about his
reasoning is true don't
 BK>>>>>>  you? That Stan said if you post something
without attribution
 BK>>>>>>  you are claiming to be the author? Not in
those exact words,

 JM>>>>> In other words he did not say what you are claiming he said.

 BK>>>>  Yes, he did.

 JM>>> Show it to me.

 BK>>  Who the fucking hell are you to demand anything?

 JH> Tagline Alert!

 JH> Ah, yet another F-Bomb from this lying, hypocritical little fellow, who
 JH> lies in this echo on a daily basis, claiming he is _against_ flaming,
 JH> and that he doesn't initiate it.  He seems to think mature adults will
 JH> somehow be intimidated and silenced by his vulgar, immature and
 JH> antisocial behavior.

 JM>> You made the claim, you back it up.

 JH> This little fellow has posted so many different paraphrase versions of
 JH> what he claims Stan has said on this that he has lost all credibility.
 JH> Too bad the echo doesn't have a puosu rule.  Klahn's current tactic on
 JH> this is becoming mind-numbingly boring.  The list of folks who have him
 JH> twitted is about to grow if he keeps this up.

 JH> - - -  JimH.

 JH> .. "Who the fxxking hell are you to demand
anything?"-Flamer Klahn 6/20/07

He can't even show me what he is basing his "That Stan said if you
post something without attribution you are claiming to be the author? Not
in those exact words."  He should be able to show what he is drawing
his conclusion from.

--- Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (Windows/20070604)