Bob Klahn -> John Massey wrote:
 BK> ..

 BK>>>>>>>  Yes, he did.

 JM>>>>>> Show it to me.

 BK>>>>>  Who the fucking hell are you to demand anything?

 JM>>>> You made the claim, you back it up.

 BK>>>  Show me how you rate it.

 JM>> OK, Don't back up what you say. We all know you lie with
 JM>> the ease of a rug. This is just more evidence. (Note I did
 JM>> not say proof)

 BK>  Because Stan has started laying on the bull shit, I have started
 BK>  to search the archives for his messages on this. It was
 BK>  stretched out over months, at least 5 near as I can figure. The
 BK>  archives are just copies of the messages, so they aren't all
 BK>  that organized, not sorted except by msg number and date.

Not MY Problem


 BK>  One of the things I did find was, an email from Gary B. May 15,
 BK>  03.

So drag it on out. Lets see what has put a burr up your butt.

In it he included an email from you in which *YOU* identify
 BK>  your behavior, in posting material without crediting the author,
 BK>  as plagiarism. I specifically said it was not, but *YOU* said it
 BK>  was.

 BK>  So, shove it. You already know. Or did you forget? Well, there's
 BK>  your reminder.

What I know or do not know has nothing to do with you backing up what you claim.

--- Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (Windows/20070604)