| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: Vista tilt bit? |
MSGID: 1:379/45 e9275ca4
REPLY: 1:379/45 41b53279
TZUTC: -0500
CHARSET: PC-8
From: "Rich Gauszka"
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0035_01C72B5E.5E7C19A0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
yet there are others who see differently even on Slashdot
http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=3D06/12/25/2034238
and
http://dcssec.blogspot.com/2006/12/musings-about-vista.html
My verdict: Vista has some ugly features which will get in the way of = any DCS
or SCADA deployment. Not just now, but perhaps for many Service = Packs to come
(If Microsoft stays in business for that long). Microsoft = would do well to
heed the advice of Gutman and many others to temper = their efforts at
"managing content." I can smell what's coming next. = Microsoft
would probably
like to deny their OS to most Open Source = Software.=20
and
http://www.miraesoft.com/karel/2006/12/25/cost-analysis-of-windows-vista-=
content-protection/
and
http://www.joeuser.com/articleComments.asp?c=3D1&AID=3D139787
and
http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2006/12/a_cost_analysis.html
and
http://blogs.cio.com/node/570
I've seen some commentary that blames Microsoft for enthusiastically =
embracing DRM and other commentary that depicts big media as the = culprit, due
to its refusal to enable access to high-def content unless = the scheme was in
place; in the latter scenario Microsoft is an = unwilling victim forced to
acquiesce in order to enable its customers to = access new-generation digital
entertainment. I'm not really interested = in whether to despise Microsoft or
to pity it; however, I know that no = end user is going to see this
functionality as helpful in his or her = daily life. This seems like
functionality put into the system not to = serve the actual user, but to
appease a powerful constituency that, = through money and legislation, can
bring more pressure to bear than can = individual users. I predict an uproar
around DRM when Vista rolls out, = and a widespread rejection of new-gen media
on PCs due to the onerous = requirements.
--------------
=20
"Rich" wrote in message news:45957597$1{at}w3.nls.net...
The gutman guys drivel was so silly and false that even folks on =
slashdot mocked it. the register's credibility has long been lacking.
Rich
"Rich Gauszka" wrote in message =
news:4594a70f$1{at}w3.nls.net...
Gutman: "If I do ever want to play back premium content," he wrote, =
"I'll=20
wait a few years and then buy a $50 Chinese-made set-top player to =
do it,=20
not a $1000 Windows PC. It's somewhat bizarre that I have to go to =
Communist=20
China in order to find vendors who actually understand the =
consumer's=20
needs."
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/12/28/vista_drm_analysis/
------=_NextPart_000_0035_01C72B5E.5E7C19A0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
yet there are others who see =
differently even on=20
Slashdot
http://" target="new">http://=">http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=3D06/12/25/2034238">http://=
it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=3D06/12/25/2034238
and
http=">http://dcssec.blogspot.com/2006/12/musings-about-vista.html">http=
://dcssec.blogspot.com/2006/12/musings-about-vista.html
My verdict: Vista has some ugly features which will get in the way =
of any=20
DCS or SCADA deployment. Not just now, but perhaps for many Service = Packs
to=20
come (If Microsoft stays in business for that long). Microsoft would do = well
to=20
heed the advice of Gutman and many others to temper their efforts at =
"managing=20
content." I can smell what's coming next. Microsoft would probably like = to
deny=20
their OS to most Open Source Software.
and
http://www.miraesoft.com/karel/2006/12/25/cost-analysis-of-window=
s-vista-content-protection/">http://www.miraesoft.com/karel/2006/12/25/co=
st-analysis-of-windows-vista-content-protection/
and
http://www.joeuser.com/articleComments.asp?c=3D1&AID=3D139787=
">http://www.joeuser.com/articleComments.asp?c=3D1&AID=3D139787=
FONT>
and
http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2006/12/a_cost_analysis.htm=
l">http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2006/12/a_cost_analysis.html;=
and
http://blogs.cio.com/node/570<" target="new">http://blogs.cio.com/node/570<=">http://blogs.cio.com/node/570">http://blogs.cio.com/node/570<=
/FONT>
I've seen some commentary that blames Microsoft for =
enthusiastically=20
embracing DRM and other commentary that depicts big media as the = culprit, due
to=20
its refusal to enable access to high-def content unless the scheme was = in
place;=20
in the latter scenario Microsoft is an unwilling victim forced to = acquiesce
in=20
order to enable its customers to access new-generation digital =
entertainment.=20
I'm not really interested in whether to despise Microsoft or to pity it; =
however, I know that no end user is going to see this functionality as =
helpful=20
in his or her daily life. This seems like functionality put into the = system
not=20
to serve the actual user, but to appease a powerful constituency that, =
through=20
money and legislation, can bring more pressure to bear than can = individual=20
users. I predict an uproar around DRM when Vista rolls out, and a =
widespread=20
rejection of new-gen media on PCs due to the onerous requirements.
--------------
* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45)SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 5030/786 @PATH: 261/1 38 123/500 379/1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.