From Newsgroup: alt.tv.star-trek.tos
From Address: epwise{at}yahoo.com
Subject: Re: Star Trek Into Darkness

Lance Corporal Hammer Schultz  wrote in 
news:1sw733l51ydv5$.dlg{at}starfist.thorsfinni:

> On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 09:16:41 +1200, Your Name wrote:
> 
>> If they want to make a "Star Trek" show, then it MUST
fit with what 
has
>> come before, and not via same lame, half-assed time travel excuse 
that
>> doesn't work thanks to all the other silly changes and 
inconsistencies.
> 
> Yeah, cuz Trek has never had inconsistent time travel / alternate
> universe stories in it, ever ever.
> 
> Whatever.  You don't actually even know if you don't like it because
> you won't watch it.  I, on the other hand, watched it and decided I
> can easily make space for yet another alternate dimension in the Trek
> multi-canon for this re-boot.  The pre-movie graphic novel with
> LaForge (Countdown to Darkness) is no less "plausible" in a Trek sense
> than any of the other innumerable reset-button plots that have
> preceded it.  Works for me.
> 

You'll have to excuse Your Name. He's a child.  He expects everyone to 
agree with him and then pouts and complains when they don't. 
--- Synchronet 3.15a-Linux NewsLink 1.92-mlp
--- SBBSecho 2.12-Linux