RC> You are eerily silent on this Democrat Dufus..

 So were you.

 RC> Since you are the Great White Apologist for those things
 RC> racial, lets examine this case.

 Your failure is that you have nothing positive to say on racial
 issues. Nothing positive about black people.

 ...

 RC> Duke University, a college that has well to do spoiled
 RC> rotten rich white boys attend.

 So, you have them convicted already.

 ...

 RC> blemished, lives wrecked, families taken to the breaking
 RC> points.

 The only life wrecked was Nifong's.

 ...

 RC> Ok, so you probably read about all this in the news?

 Only people who haven't live in some other country. Or don't
 read newspapers.

 RC> You said little about it since, because it involved a
 RC> Democrat DA, who was trying to impress his african american
 RC> constituency by try to punish "whitey".

 Your telepathic powers have failed you. I didn't say little
 about it, said nothing about it recently because it hasn't been
 a topic of discussion.

 RC> If this was a case about a GOP DA who prosecuted 3 african
 RC> americans in the same manner, you would have been foaming
 RC> at the mouth.

 And you would be defending him, so what?

 ...

 RC> Had the stripper been white or the boys black, he wouldnt
 RC> have took this case,

 And you would have been all over him, even though the boys were
 innocent.

 RC> however if the boys had been black, he actually may have
 RC> seen to it no charges would have been brought.

 RC> This is a good example why no law enforcement office should
 RC> ever be an elected one.

 Bunch of cops shoot an unarmed man in NYC. Does that mean cops
 should be elected?

 Considering how honesty in govt has meant so little to the right
 over the last few years, why would any such case mean anything
 to anybody?

 I don't recall you ranting about the Central Park rapists
 spending years in prison, then being proven innocent.

 I don't recall you be outraged when Larry Peterson spent 17
 years in prison, for rape and murder, and the prosecutor vowed
 to retry him when the appeals court threw out the conviction
 when:

  The hair sample supposedly from Peterson geneticall matched the
  victim.

 The fingernail clippings supposedly matched against scratches on
 Peterson's arms turned out to have genetic material that didn't
 match his.

 The semen samples, and all other genetic samples, matched each
 other and did not match Peterson.

 Where was your outrage at the prosecutor for having him
 rearrested and planing to retry him?

 Was it because Peterson is black?

 Oh, and he has to sue to get compensation. He's 56 years old
 now, where is he going to find a job? Talk about a life wrecked.

 Answer that before you bother me with your complaints.


BOB KLAHN bob.klahn{at}sev.org   http://home.toltbbs.com/bobklahn

... Race is an idea whose time has passed. 
 * Silver Xpress V4.5/P [Reg]
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5