RK>I've seen no documention ... and by the way I WAS THERE ... and I am
RK>NOT a  military person ... The claim was MARTIAL LAW for the DAY and
RK>that the part  of the CITY was attacked ... this is not true on its
RK>face value ... I was  there and know EXACTLY what happened and what
RK>happens every so often as the  military and National Guard do traing
RK>exercises. My rights nor anyone else's  rights were violated ..
RK>Sure .. I WAS THERE ... YOU WERE NOT ... and I have received -NO
RK>PROOF- nor have I seen any -DOCUMENTATION- as to MARTIAL LAW or an
RK>ATTACK on the CITY or even PART OF THE CITY!!
My my my, how you shout and scream.
You've seen no documentation... "I was there and know EXACTLY what
happened".  Maybe it's me, but it sure seems you're talking about of
both sides of your mouth at the same time.
I know here in this conference I've seen some documentation.  In fact,
all of it was addressed to you personally.  Don't know how you missed
it.  Unless of course you've got your head firmly jammed in the sand.
That way you can insist it never happened, life in America is great, and
the military would never do something like that.  It makes ostriches
happy, so maybe it works for you too.
You know, if you'd bother to go on what I wrote, instead of what you
think I wrote, you'd remember I started with things like "now I hear"
and "apparently".  Not absolutes.  I didn't say with absolute certainty
that Pittsburg was attacked, or placed under martial law, even for a
day.
But if you like, next time there is a military exercise conducted in a
civilian area, I suggest you try to enter it and do whatever you feel.
Then you to can learn what martial law is.
---
* CMPQwk #1.4* UNREGISTERED EVALUATION COPY
--- InterEcho 1.18
---------------