PE> First of all, those lines don't do anything unless tobruk is
PE> running (squish will ignore them). 

BG> OK.  Your tobruk docs didn't make that clear.  ROFL.

You asked for executables only.

BG> What about f/as to TML points then?  I assume they're fucked as well now.

PE> I don't think you send enough netmail to care about that? 

BG> No, but it would have been nice to retain the ability to netmail your own 
BG> points directly, rather than via bloody Woop-Woop.

You never receive netmail from me EVER, remember?

PE> If you were really desperate you could send it to 3:711/934 and it would 
PE> get remapped here.  One other thing you could do would be to do a squish 
PE> squash before running Tobruk on your outbound mail.  

BG> Christ almighty, I think I prefer the simplicity of Squish!

It's simple if you put up with something which you assured me you
never did anyway.

PE> I'm still waiting for Chris Robinson or someone to acknowlege
PE> that they are receiving mail.  Is there someone else up there
PE> who gets these echos? 

BG> Not many now, only Chris, Dave, and Alex (Dave is away of course, and Alex 
BG> has presumably disappeared to lick his wounds).  Oh, and Rache as well.  :)

What wounds?  Is there some local echo that Chris reads, he hasn't
replied to my mail.

PE> Once that has been ascertained, the next step is to remove the fakenet on 
PE> just one of the echos (probably LOCSYSOP would be best), and then test the 
PE> effect of that.  

BG> Don't forget that your end was NEVER a problem, right from day 1.

The problem started when I wanted you to call with 3:711/934.18
for a different reason.  With Tobruk, I don't have that same 
requirement.  BFN.  Paul.
@EOT:

---