Bob Klahn -> John Massey wrote:

 JM>> O BullShit You drop a flame at people for no reason other
 JM>> than to drop a flame.

 BK>  Lie.

Truth

 BK>  Hulett says you are wrong.

No Hulett say:
 BK>  **************************************************************************
 EH>> Klahn opens himself up to flames...
 EH>> He then feels the necessity to flame back because he's
 EH>> afraid of looking weak.
 BK>  **************************************************************************
Which is true, but you also will flame first. Only you don't think what you
do is flaming.


 JM>>>> That's why you post in this echo,

 BK>>>  Really really dumb. Explain why I posted in this echo before
 BK>>>  Stan arrived, in Jan 05. Back when this echo was flame free.

 BK>  I notice you have no answer to this.

You have never proven this echo was flame free before Jan 05. You have only
expressed your opinion that it was.



 JM>>>> and why your Debate echo is, for all practical purposes, dead

 BK>>>  So, you are saying a flame echo is better than no echo?

 JM>> yep

 BK>  That is a measure of you, not me.

Yep, I can deal with it , You can't. You whine line a picked on play ground
kid about the flamers rather that deal with it.

 BK>>>  disagree. I would rather see the echo die than turn into a flame
 BK>>>  echo.

 JM>> Well if debate is any example, you got your wish.

 BK>  Lots of echos have slow times, esp in summer. Almost everything
 BK>  in this echo is flame. If a few of us left this echo would die
 BK>  practically overnight.

Please Please give it a try.


 JM>>>> BTW what has happen to that anal retentive lawyer
 JM>>>> co-moderator  that answers post 6 months old with what I'm
 JM>>>> sure he thinks is witty repartee.

 BK>>>  Just who are you talking about? You seem to be confused again.

 JM>> I think his name is Peter, something or other.

 BK>  No one fitting the description you gave.

Yeah but calling him an arrogant prick seemed just to much.

--- Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (Windows/20070604)