BG>     Spirit  Spirit
BG>     Spirit  Rockwell

PE> Nope, we do not have proper evidence of the SpiritSpirit
double sending 
PE> occurring, as only one person has ever reported it,

BG> Who just happens to be Dave Hatch, and if he says that he's seen it between 
BG> two Spirits, even only once, I wouldn't be too quick to disbelieve him.

Even if we do believe him, try to understand the VAST difference
between a problem that occurs ~0% (possibly even 0), and one that
occurs ~100% of the time.  I know Rod is too thick to be able to
tell the difference between 0 and 100, but I expected you to.

PE> and I have sent SpiritSpirit data to that person for about
a year, and 
PE> I've done many transfers with other Spirits too, and never once seen the 
PE> problem. 

BG> Because you're using a hacked version of Binkley which has been 
BG> specifically designed to prevent this problem from occurring (the 3/10th 
BG> second delay).

BEFORE I put in the 3/10 second delay, I had been sending and
receiving stuff EVERY SINGLE DAY and never ONCE seen the problem.
And also almost every single day I had been doing the same thing
with Paul Markham.  And also, even with the 3/10 second delay, 
the double-sending still happens up to the point that the 
transfer actually starts, ie the inital 10 seconds my MR light
flashes away.  Also, Dave was sending ME stuff, which means my
3/10 second delay does diddly squat for fixing a problem with
him sending me stuff.

BG> I also note with extreme interest that you carefully deleted the following 
BG> from my original message...

BG>     "It does NOT happen with USR//Rockwell  USR//Rockwell"

BG> Care to explain why this might be?  No?  I thought not.  :)

It also doesn't happen SpiritUSR.  Care to explain that?  It
also doesn't occur SpiritSpirit.  Care to explain that?  Or
at least, the SpiritSpirit occurrences number about the same
as the RockwellRockwell, and both are WAY WAY below normal
statistical tolerance levels.  BFN.  Paul.
@EOT:

---