From: "Rich" 

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0036_01C33D53.6764B920
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

   I'll gadly do so but since we are discussing things you did in this =
forum I expect you have some memory of your own actions.  If making =
claims about something unrelated to you I would not have the same =
expectation.  All you are doing now is try to create excuses for you, or =
maybe others, not to support claims they make.

   The issue in question is not just that you don't support the claims =
you make, but that you, and sometimes others, also make up facts and use =
the fiction just created to support claims.  Also, it's not that you =
don't provide support when I ask, you should do so when you make the =
claim not only if challenged to support it.

Rich

  "Geo."  wrote in message =
news:3efd8af8$1{at}w3.nls.net...
  All I want is for you to provide some support for your claim.. Surely =
you of
  all people should be able to practice what you preach. Your claim, =
your
  rule, seems clear to me what is required.. unless you would accept =
someone
  telling you to go read the MS website as proof of their claim. Or do =
you
  want to deny you require others to prove their statements while you =
try to
  slip by with the "I do not keep an archive" defense?

  You want me to cut you some slack, OK I have no problem with that but =
then I
  expect the same in return next time we get into a discussion, don't =
use this
  as tactic when you know proof is not an option. Let me rephrase that, =
don't
  throw up a roadblock after asking for proof and not receiving it =
because of
  the amount of work involved in getting that proof.

  That said, I yield, I admit I don't provide proof every time you ask =
for it.

  Geo.

  "Rich"  wrote in message news:3efd013d$1{at}w3.nls.net...
     Go back and look at any of the several occasions when I told you =
just
  that.  I do not keep an archive.  Or do you want to deny it ever =
happened?

  Rich

    "Geo."  wrote in message =
news:3efcebc2{at}w3.nls.net...

    "Rich"  wrote in message news:3efbbc16$1{at}w3.nls.net...
    >>   It's far simpler.  Go back and see if you made a claim and =
failed to
    provide any support for your claim.  Better still when the claim is =
false
  as
    is often the case here.  You are particular often make things up and =
then
    use the fiction you just created to try to support claims you are
  making.<<

    Interesting claim, care to provide some support for it?

    Geo. 



------=_NextPart_000_0036_01C33D53.6764B920
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable








   I'll
gadly do so but since =
we are=20
discussing things you did in this forum I expect you have some memory of = your=20
own actions.  If making claims about something unrelated to you I
= would not=20
have the same expectation.  All you are doing now is try to create
= excuses=20
for you, or maybe others, not to support claims they make.
 
   The issue
in question is =
not just that=20
you don't support the claims you make, but that you, and sometimes = others, also=20
make up facts and use the fiction just created to support claims. 
= Also,=20
it's not that you don't provide support when I ask, you should do so = when you=20
make the claim not only if challenged to support it.
 
Rich
 

  "Geo." <georger{at}nls.net>">mailto:georger{at}nls.net">georger{at}nls.net>
wrote=20
  in message news:3efd8af8$1{at}w3.nls.net...All I=20
  want is for you to provide some support for your claim.. Surely you =
ofall=20
  people should be able to practice what you preach. Your claim, =
yourrule,=20
  seems clear to me what is required.. unless you would accept=20
  someonetelling you to go read the MS website as proof of their =
claim. Or=20
  do youwant to deny you require others to prove their statements =
while you=20
  try toslip by with the "I do not keep an archive" =
defense?You want=20
  me to cut you some slack, OK I have no problem with that but then =
Iexpect=20
  the same in return next time we get into a discussion, don't use =
thisas=20
  tactic when you know proof is not an option. Let me rephrase that,=20
  don'tthrow up a roadblock after asking for proof and not receiving =
it=20
  because ofthe amount of work involved in getting that =
proof.That=20
  said, I yield, I admit I don't provide proof every time you ask for=20
  it.Geo."Rich"
<{at}> wrote in message news:3efd013d$1{at}w3.nls.net...=
  =20
  Go back and look at any of the several occasions when I told you=20
  justthat.  I do not keep an archive.  Or do
you want to =
deny it=20
  ever happened?Rich 
"Geo." <georger{at}nls.net>">mailto:georger{at}nls.net">georger{at}nls.net>
wrote in =
message news:3efcebc2{at}w3.nls.net...=
 =20
  "Rich" <{at}> wrote in message news:3efbbc16$1{at}w3.nls.net...=
 =20
  >>   It's far simpler.  Go back
and see if you =
made a=20
  claim and failed to  provide any support for your =
claim.  Better=20
  still when the claim is falseas  is often the case =
here. =20
  You are particular often make things up and then  use the =
fiction you=20
  just created to try to support claims you =
aremaking.<< =20
  Interesting claim, care to provide some support for
it?  =
Geo.=20
  <don't you just hate it when that=20
happens?>

------=_NextPart_000_0036_01C33D53.6764B920--

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-4