From: "Robert Comer" 

> As Rich said, the Temp folder and the Temporary Internet Files folder are
> not part of what roams when you have roaming profiles.

Yep, saw that, must've been something else that grew the profile beyond
usability.  I didn't take the time to figure it out, I just turned it off.
It really wasn't a necessity for our office. (I was in the early stages of
testing roaming profiles just after I put in my W2K AD controller.)

> Apart from security concerns, I think the main factor for wanting an
> individual Temp folder for each user was to make Terminal Services work in
> a more reasonable way, without horrible kludges. On a TS server, you don't
> want several concurrent users to all be using the same Temp folder.

I have no problem with the concept of separate temp folders actually, I do
not like the obfuscation tricks it does with explorer though -- it'd be
better to handle it with permissions.

- Bob Comer


"John Beckett"  wrote
in message news:3ef971a6.7805483{at}216.144.1.254...
> "Robert Comer"  wrote in message
> news::
> > Temp in the user profile's a real b&^%$ if you have roaming profiles.
(And I
> > turned those off for that and other reasons.)
>
> As Rich said, the Temp folder and the Temporary Internet Files folder are
> not part of what roams when you have roaming profiles.
>
> Apart from security concerns, I think the main factor for wanting an
> individual Temp folder for each user was to make Terminal Services work in
> a more reasonable way, without horrible kludges. On a TS server, you don't
> want several concurrent users to all be using the same Temp folder.
>
> John
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-4