BG> You mean I'll finally be getting my netmail now? Hallelujah!
PE> You were always getting netmail to your address. If you wish to
PE> associate with people who post to a hypothetical system which
PE> you never log on to, you'll never get the mail.
BG> In that case, why is it that until two days ago, I had NEVER received a
BG> netmail message from anybody via your board? Not even once, Paul. Funny
BG> that.
You should be very careful about lying through your back teeth
when I am sitting on a netmail messagebase of 4351 messages (on
3:711/934, not 3:711/934.9, that's even bigger). Or was it a
ghost that wrote this reply to Dieter? This is the first one I
found in my messagebase. Actually there was another, but no
proof that you received it by way of reply. I fail to see what's
so secret about the message, but I'll assume it is the company
names and so I'll censor them. A muttered apology will suffice.
Date: 1994-07-28 22:17:06
From: Dieter Mirbach of 3:711/934.8
To: Bill Grimsley of 3:711/934.18
Subj: Os/2 zealots
Attr: sent scanned
Area: NETMAIL
* Reply to msg originally in AUST_AVTEC
Hope this comes thpough as Private.....
BG> the Datagraphics 4560 beastie (bet you don't know what that
BG> machine's primary function was, either). ;-)
DM> COM.
BG> Smart-arse! Now you can really dazzle us with your knowledge by
BG> deciphering the above acronym. BTW, you got the COM right, but I bet
BG> you can't tell me which IRQ. ;-)
DM> I think....
BG> Seriously, well done. How did you know?
Ever heard of or worked for any of these Australian companies :
XXXXXXXX
YYYYYYYYYYYYY
ZZZZZZ
AAAAAAAAAAAAAA
I can't really say much more until I'm assured this is
reasonably private.... truely :-))
Dieter
... deny thy father and forget thy tagline.
Date: 1994-07-30 09:35:38
From: Bill Grimsley of 3:711/934.18
To: Dieter Mirbach of 3:711/934.8
Subj: Os/2 zealots
Attr: priv sent scanned
Area: NETMAIL
Dieter, at 22:17 on Thu, Jul 28 1994, you wrote to Bill Grimsley ...
DM> Hope this comes through as Private.....
Well, the PVT flag is set, whatever that means. ;-)
BG> the Datagraphics 4560 beastie (bet you don't know what that
BG> machine's primary function was, either). ;-)
DM> COM.
BG> Seriously, well done. How did you know?
DM>
You've been taking lessons from Amfony, I see.
DM> Ever heard of or worked for any of these Australian companies :
DM> XXXXXXXX
DM> YYYYYYYYYYYYY
DM> ZZZZZZ
DM> AAAAAAAAAAAAAA
I've heard of all of them to varying degrees, but I've not worked for any of
them, or their subsidiaries (to the best of my knowledge).
DM> I can't really say much more until I'm assured this is
DM> reasonably private.... truely :-))
Only our sysops can read netmail, and I'm sure they don't bother, so it's about
as private as Fidonet ever gets.
FWIW, in the mid-70s I used to work for BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB (way back
when they were called CCCCCCCC) in their COM bureau, and moved to DDDDDDDD
DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD when EEE sold out to that company a couple of years later.
So anyway, Dieter, tell me more ... ;-)
Regards, Bill
@EOT:
---
* Origin: X (3:711/934.9)
|