| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Situation on R2:50 |
10 May 06 12:11, Vladimir Donskoy wrote to Roy Witt: VD>>>>>>> 1.2.5 - "Zone Coordinators are selected by the Regional VD>>>>>>> Coordinators in that zone." RW>>>>>> The word 'selected' means the same as appointed. Not elected. VD>>>>> Who can "appoint" ZC? So - it is elections... But means I VD>>>>> understand. RW>>>> The RCs in council choose and appoint the ZC, they're known as the RW>>>> RCC. They vote, but it's not an election per se', it's a RW>>>> selection. VD>>> OK, "RCC" is your term. RW>> Read Section 6.2 about 'selection'... VD> Next 2 strings... VD>>>>>>> 6.2 - "The Zone Coordinator is selected by an absolute majority VD>>>>>>> vote of the Regional Coordinators within the zone." VD> Where is term "RCC"? Where is our "Conclave" (like as ZCC)? There isn't any mention of an RCC, per se', but one can conclude that there can be an RCC by the wording of the above quote in 6.2... There has been a RCC in Z1 for many years. Z1's RCC has in the past, run the Z1C elections and have taken the votes of the sysops, represented by the singular vote of their NCs, to collectively 'select' the ZC. RW>>>> Only by RCC. The IC has nothing to do with it and is merely RW>>>> another ZC and is equal, but not higher than the rest of the ZCs, RW>>>> per policy. VD>>> So - it is impossible: RCC of Z2 not want any changes. RW>> Well, if you look at the regions in Z2, you can see that there are RW>> 'dead' regions with only an RC and no nets in the region. That's RW>> called Z2C nodelist stuffing, just to thwart this sort of thing. RW>> Thus, why you need a one sysop, one vote election. VD> So - Z2C is not working, but I know it very long time... So did I. VD>>> .. It want only same RCs, so - election Z2C by these RCs will start VD>>> splitting of zone. :-( VD>>> But Policy 1.2.7 write: "The International Coordinator acts as the VD>>> chair of the Zone Coordinator Council and as the overseer of VD>>> _elections_ -- arranging the announcement of referenda, the VD>>> collection and counting of the ballots, and announcing the results VD>>> for those issues that affect FidoNet as a whole." VD>>> What "elections" it mean? RW>> RCC policy referendum elections. Which in turn must be approved by RW>> the ZCC. VD> Where is "election" in the Policy referendum? Election is implied by the wording. It takes a majority vote of the RCC to implement a policy change. That 'selection' by the RCs is managed and votes (selections) collected by the IC. VD> This is a selection - one variant from many! Have no mans who VD> "elected" to same place. It's not a vote or selection of any *Cs... Roy --- Twit(t) Filter v2.1 (C) 2000* Origin: Hacienda de Rio de Guadalupe * South * Texas, USA * (1:1/22) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 5030/786 @PATH: 1/22 379/1 106/2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.