Charles Angelich wrote in a message to Roy J. Tellason:

RJT> I *might* pursue it if it made that much of a difference in terms 
RJT> of employment, but I havent gotten to that point yet. 

RJT> Doesn't w2k require a bit more in terms of hardware, too? What 
RJT> would be a good minimum system to install that on to and get a 
RJT> feel for it? I'm guessing probably more than what I have on hand 
RJT> here.

CA> FWIW I'm using W2K right now on a 450mhz with 192meg memory.

Exactly my point.  The most machine I have here right now is the linux box
which is a K6-200 w/64M.  And I plan to keep it that way.

CA> The OS takes up less than 2 gig probably closer to 1.5 gig.

*sigh*

CA> I also have W2K installed onto a 233mhz machine here with only 
CA> 64meg of memory and it seems to function OK just a bit sluggish
CA> compared to the 450.

I might be getting a hold of a MB with a Celeron 233 on it,  dunno if
that'll have any ram on it or not,  but I plan to install linux on that, 
too.  :-)

---